🔗 Share this article

Recently, Battlefield Studios introduced a new playlist called Casual Breakthrough. To put it simply, this mode mirrors the regular Breakthrough format but features a few notable changes:

• Each team has only eight real players, with the remaining filled by AI-controlled opponents.
• Actions performed by real players award full XP, while bot actions provide reduced XP.
• Only two locations are available: Siege of Cairo and Empire State map.
• Elements like Player tags, accolades, and stat tracking have been turned off.

So essentially, the playlist lives up to its name: it offers a casual take of Breakthrough. At face value, one could assume there's nothing wrong, as it gives more options for players seeking different methods to have fun with the game. But, if video games have taught us anything, it is that not everyone will be happy. Which is to say, a lot of BF6 fans are upset.

Community Reactions: From Fury to Support

"Gamers prefer human opponents. Avoid making the errors of your rivals," states a response to the official announcement. "Absolutely shocking concept," comments a different user. At the same time, in community forums, one user remarks, "It's unclear where we are going with this title," while another details everything they consider to be broken in Battlefield 6: "Resolve glitches, address drone issues, fix IVF rockets, fix [the] bloom after sprinting bug, fix awful hit registration. We do not require this AI-heavy playlist."

However, amid the criticism, some gamers sharing how much they're liking the new mode. "It's very fun to practice, real players keep it from being a total farmfest but it's quite laid-back," reads a forum post. "This subreddit fails to see that there are gamers who actually go outside and don't play this title all the time. Allow them to find a middle ground," adds a different comment. One reply via social media clarifies that as they're "a battledad with limited time, this is perfect for me," while someone else applauds the mode for "avoiding intense competition."

Constructive Concerns and Player Input

All that said, players have valid points to complain about the new mode. A few folks have pointed out that it could increase queue times more extended for different playlists because of the sheer number of playlists in the game already. Similarly, certain regions often face AI-filled matches in the current modes. It also seems a little backwards that the mode does not begin without a required amount of real players, despite it primarily centers on fighting AI opponents.

Finally, a major complaints is that Battlefield Portal was meant to offer full XP, including AI matches, but that was removed when they attempted to eliminate XP farming from the mode. So this new playlist feels like the player base compromising in the middle, as per forum feedback. Another labels this mode as the developers "making a mistake so hard, I experienced so much fun in the first couple of days, why did they feel the need to adjust it?"

Future Prospects: Will Changes Be Made?

Should Battlefield Studios has proven anything so far with the latest installment, it is that they're paying attention and acting on player input. Assignments that were overly hard were adjusted rapidly, just like the required Redsec challenges. Chances are that, should analytics shows this new playlist isn't performing to their expectations, they won't be shy to make further modifications.