🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have decided to withdraw from an international accord designed to protect women from violence, including family violence, following extensive and intense debates in the parliament.

Several thousand of protesters gathered in the capital this past week to voice disagreement with the vote. The ultimate decision now lies with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to approve or reject the legislation.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only became active in Latvia last twelve months ago, requiring governments to develop legal frameworks and support services to eliminate all forms of abuse.

Latvia has become the initial EU country to begin the procedure of exiting from the convention. Turkey withdrew in two years ago, a move that human rights organizations characterized as a significant setback for gender equality.

Ideological Controversy and Resistance

The international agreement was approved by the EU in last year, yet conservative factions have contended that its focus on gender equality undermines family values and promotes what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Saeima, MPs voted by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the convention, a move proposed by opposition parties but supported by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a defeat for moderate conservative Prime Minister Evika Silina, who joined demonstrators outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that violence will not prevail," she declared to the assembly.

Ideological Disagreements and Responses

One of the main parties advocating for the exit is Latvia First, whose leader has urged the public to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

Latvia's ombudswoman the rights official urged the agreement not to be politicized, while the group Equality Now stated it was "not a threat to national principles, it was an instrument to realize them".

The Thursday's vote has sparked broad protest both within Latvia and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand people have signed a national petition calling for the convention to be preserved. The women's rights organization the rights center has called a demonstration for the coming week, accusing lawmakers of ignoring the will of the nation's citizens.

Global Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The leader of the Council of Europe's legislative body stated that the Baltic state had made a rash decision driven by false information. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying step backward for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He noted that since Turkey left the convention four years ago, cases of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not secure a supermajority majority, the president could potentially return the bill for further review if he has concerns.

Head of State the national leader announced on digital platforms that he would assess the decision according to legal requirements, "considering state and legal considerations, instead of belief-based viewpoints".

Recently, another member of the governing alliance, the reformist party, suggested it would not rule out petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a worrisome situation for gender equality not only in Latvia but across the continent," stated a rights activist.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been increasing in multiple EU countries
• The Istanbul Convention requires particular safeguards for victims of domestic abuse
• The nation's vote could affect similar discussions in other member states